Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Corona, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $633,400 |
| White | 66% | 75% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 40% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Pleasant Hill?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 163585 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z