Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Pico Rivera
This post compares Corona, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $380,200 |
| White | 66% | 55% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 11% | 3% |
| With Kids | 40% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 36 |
| Rentals | 35% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Pico Rivera?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 163585 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z