Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Pasadena
This post compares Corona, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $689,700 |
| White | 66% | 53% |
| Black | 5% | 10% |
| Asian | 11% | 16% |
| With Kids | 40% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 37 |
| Rentals | 35% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Pasadena?
A: Corona has a similar population count than Pasadena: 163585 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z