Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Palm Springs
This post compares Corona, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $340,600 |
| White | 66% | 83% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 11% | 4% |
| With Kids | 40% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 54 |
| Rentals | 35% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Palm Springs?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Palm Springs: 163585 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z