Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to North Highlands
This post compares Corona, California to North Highlands, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Corona (city) | North Highlands (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 163,585 | 47,357 |
Income (median) | $50,094 | $35,489 |
Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $168,300 |
White | 66% | 65% |
Black | 5% | 13% |
Asian | 11% | 6% |
With Kids | 40% | 41% |
Age (median) | 34 | 31 |
Rentals | 35% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or North Highlands?
A: Corona has a larger population count than North Highlands: 163585 compared with 47357 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in North Highlands?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or North Highlands?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: North Highlands does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 57% for North Highlands.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z