Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to National City
This post compares Corona, California to National City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | National City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 60,715 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $30,943 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $345,400 |
| White | 66% | 61% |
| Black | 5% | 5% |
| Asian | 11% | 19% |
| With Kids | 40% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 35% | 67% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or National City?
A: Corona has a larger population count than National City: 163585 compared with 60715 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in National City?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or National City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: National City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 67% for National City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z