Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Napa
This post compares Corona, California to Napa, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Napa (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 79,722 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $51,449 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $536,800 |
| White | 66% | 76% |
| Black | 5% | 0% |
| Asian | 11% | 3% |
| With Kids | 40% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 35% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Napa?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Napa: 163585 compared with 79722 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Napa?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Napa?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Napa does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 43% for Napa.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z