Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Los Angeles
This post compares Corona, California to Los Angeles, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Los Angeles (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 3,949,776 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $40,932 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $549,800 |
| White | 66% | 52% |
| Black | 5% | 8% |
| Asian | 11% | 11% |
| With Kids | 40% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 35% | 63% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Los Angeles?
A: Corona has a much smaller population count than Los Angeles: 163585 compared with 3949776 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Los Angeles?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Los Angeles?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Los Angeles does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 63% for Los Angeles.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z