Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Lincoln
This post compares Corona, California to Lincoln, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Lincoln (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 46,404 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $59,287 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $389,900 |
| White | 66% | 81% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 6% |
| With Kids | 40% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 43 |
| Rentals | 35% | 21% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Lincoln?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Lincoln: 163585 compared with 46404 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Lincoln?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Lincoln?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 21% for Lincoln.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z