Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Lake Forest
This post compares Corona, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Corona (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 163,585 | 81,812 |
Income (median) | $50,094 | $64,458 |
Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $585,100 |
White | 66% | 67% |
Black | 5% | 2% |
Asian | 11% | 15% |
With Kids | 40% | 34% |
Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
Rentals | 35% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Lake Forest?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Lake Forest: 163585 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 35% for Corona versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z