Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Laguna Hills
This post compares Corona, California to Laguna Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Corona (city) | Laguna Hills (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 163,585 | 31,235 |
Income (median) | $50,094 | $58,400 |
Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $649,700 |
White | 66% | 69% |
Black | 5% | 2% |
Asian | 11% | 14% |
With Kids | 40% | 31% |
Age (median) | 34 | 41 |
Rentals | 35% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Laguna Hills?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than Laguna Hills: 163585 compared with 31235 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Laguna Hills?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Laguna Hills?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corona does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 29% for Laguna Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z