Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Irvine
This post compares Corona, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $753,400 |
| White | 66% | 47% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 41% |
| With Kids | 40% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 34 |
| Rentals | 35% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Irvine?
A: Corona has a smaller population count than Irvine: 163585 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z