Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Foothill Farms
This post compares Corona, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $201,200 |
| White | 66% | 67% |
| Black | 5% | 9% |
| Asian | 11% | 5% |
| With Kids | 40% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 35% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Foothill Farms?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than Foothill Farms: 163585 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z