Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Desert Hot Springs
This post compares Corona, California to Desert Hot Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Desert Hot Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 28,298 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $32,379 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $154,600 |
| White | 66% | 70% |
| Black | 5% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 2% |
| With Kids | 40% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 34 |
| Rentals | 35% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than Desert Hot Springs: 163585 compared with 28298 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Desert Hot Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Desert Hot Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Desert Hot Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 56% for Desert Hot Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z