Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Culver City
This post compares Corona, California to Culver City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Culver City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 39,432 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $65,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $735,600 |
| White | 66% | 62% |
| Black | 5% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 15% |
| With Kids | 40% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 35% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Culver City?
A: Corona has a much larger population count than Culver City: 163585 compared with 39432 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Culver City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Culver City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Culver City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 46% for Culver City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z