Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Burbank
This post compares Corona, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $574,300 |
| White | 66% | 70% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 11% |
| With Kids | 40% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 35% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Burbank?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Burbank: 163585 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z