Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Baldwin Park
This post compares Corona, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $357,500 |
| White | 66% | 34% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 18% |
| With Kids | 40% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 35% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Baldwin Park?
A: Corona has a larger population count than Baldwin Park: 163585 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Baldwin Park does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z