Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corona to Bakersfield
This post compares Corona, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corona (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 163,585 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $50,094 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $411,600 | $228,400 |
| White | 66% | 68% |
| Black | 5% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 7% |
| With Kids | 40% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 30 |
| Rentals | 35% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corona or Bakersfield?
A: Corona has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 163585 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corona or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Corona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corona or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Corona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 35% for Corona versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corona may include: Manteca, Clovis, and San-Marcos.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z