Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to South San Francisco
This post compares Corcoran, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 62% | 33% |
| Black | 11% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or South San Francisco?
A: Corcoran has a much smaller population count than South San Francisco: 22650 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z