Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to South Pasadena
This post compares Corcoran, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $928,500 |
| White | 62% | 54% |
| Black | 11% | 3% |
| Asian | 0% | 29% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 40 |
| Rentals | 54% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or South Pasadena?
A: Corcoran has a similar population count than South Pasadena: 22650 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Corcoran versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z