Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Corcoran, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $374,600 |
| White | 62% | 81% |
| Black | 11% | 1% |
| Asian | 0% | 3% |
| With Kids | 49% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 38 |
| Rentals | 54% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Corcoran has a similar population count than South Lake Tahoe: 22650 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Corcoran versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z