Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Corcoran, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $444,200 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 11% | 9% |
| Asian | 0% | 13% |
| With Kids | 49% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 35 |
| Rentals | 54% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Corcoran has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 22650 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z