Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to Palm Springs
This post compares Corcoran, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $340,600 |
| White | 62% | 83% |
| Black | 11% | 4% |
| Asian | 0% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 54 |
| Rentals | 54% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or Palm Springs?
A: Corcoran has a much smaller population count than Palm Springs: 22650 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z