Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to Lancaster
This post compares Corcoran, California to Lancaster, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | Lancaster (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 160,113 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $42,993 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $213,100 |
| White | 62% | 62% |
| Black | 11% | 21% |
| Asian | 0% | 4% |
| With Kids | 49% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 32 |
| Rentals | 54% | 46% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or Lancaster?
A: Corcoran has a much smaller population count than Lancaster: 22650 compared with 160113 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in Lancaster?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or Lancaster?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 46% for Lancaster.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z