Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to Lake Forest
This post compares Corcoran, California to Lake Forest, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | Lake Forest (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 81,812 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $64,458 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $585,100 |
| White | 62% | 67% |
| Black | 11% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 15% |
| With Kids | 49% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 39 |
| Rentals | 54% | 30% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or Lake Forest?
A: Corcoran has a much smaller population count than Lake Forest: 22650 compared with 81812 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in Lake Forest?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or Lake Forest?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 30% for Lake Forest.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z