Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to La Verne
This post compares Corcoran, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $535,900 |
| White | 62% | 74% |
| Black | 11% | 4% |
| Asian | 0% | 7% |
| With Kids | 49% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 43 |
| Rentals | 54% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or La Verne?
A: Corcoran has a smaller population count than La Verne: 22650 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z