Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to Foothill Farms
This post compares Corcoran, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $201,200 |
| White | 62% | 67% |
| Black | 11% | 9% |
| Asian | 0% | 5% |
| With Kids | 49% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or Foothill Farms?
A: Corcoran has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 22650 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 54% for Corcoran versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z