Compare-Cities.com
Compare Corcoran to Baldwin Park
This post compares Corcoran, California to Baldwin Park, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Corcoran (city) | Baldwin Park (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 22,650 | 76,572 |
| Income (median) | $35,242 | $31,956 |
| Home Value (median) | $122,700 | $357,500 |
| White | 62% | 34% |
| Black | 11% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 18% |
| With Kids | 49% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 34 | 33 |
| Rentals | 54% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Corcoran or Baldwin Park?
A: Corcoran has a much smaller population count than Baldwin Park: 22650 compared with 76572 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Corcoran or in Baldwin Park?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Corcoran.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Corcoran or Baldwin Park?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Corcoran.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Corcoran does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 54% for Corcoran versus 43% for Baldwin Park.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Corcoran may include: North-Highlands, Colton, and Desert-Hot-Springs.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z