Compare-Cities.com
Compare Concord to South San Francisco
This post compares Concord, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Concord (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,160 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $56,608 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,700 | $697,400 |
| White | 67% | 33% |
| Black | 3% | 2% |
| Asian | 11% | 39% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 40% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Concord or South San Francisco?
A: Concord has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 128160 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Concord or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Concord.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Concord or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Concord.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Concord does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Concord versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Concord may include: Upland, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z