Compare-Cities.com
Compare Concord to South Pasadena
This post compares Concord, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Concord (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,160 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $56,608 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,700 | $928,500 |
| White | 67% | 54% |
| Black | 3% | 3% |
| Asian | 11% | 29% |
| With Kids | 33% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 40% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Concord or South Pasadena?
A: Concord has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 128160 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Concord or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Concord.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Concord or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Concord.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Concord versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Concord may include: Upland, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z