Compare-Cities.com
Compare Concord to San Francisco
This post compares Concord, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Concord (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,160 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $56,608 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,700 | $927,400 |
| White | 67% | 47% |
| Black | 3% | 5% |
| Asian | 11% | 34% |
| With Kids | 33% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 40% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Concord or San Francisco?
A: Concord has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 128160 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Concord or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Concord.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Concord or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Concord.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Concord versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Concord may include: Upland, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z