Compare-Cities.com
Compare Concord to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Concord, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Concord (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,160 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $56,608 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,700 | $444,200 |
| White | 67% | 62% |
| Black | 3% | 9% |
| Asian | 11% | 13% |
| With Kids | 33% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 40% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Concord or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Concord has a smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 128160 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Concord or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Concord.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Concord or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Concord.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Concord does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Concord versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Concord may include: Upland, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z