Compare-Cities.com
Compare Concord to Beverly Hills
This post compares Concord, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Concord (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,160 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $56,608 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,700 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 67% | 82% |
| Black | 3% | 1% |
| Asian | 11% | 9% |
| With Kids | 33% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 40% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Concord or Beverly Hills?
A: Concord has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 128160 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Concord or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Concord.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Concord or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Concord.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 40% for Concord versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Concord may include: Upland, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z