Compare-Cities.com
Compare Concord to Bakersfield
This post compares Concord, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Concord (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 128,160 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $56,608 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $461,700 | $228,400 |
| White | 67% | 68% |
| Black | 3% | 7% |
| Asian | 11% | 7% |
| With Kids | 33% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 30 |
| Rentals | 40% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Concord or Bakersfield?
A: Concord has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 128160 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Concord or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Concord.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Concord or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Concord.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 40% for Concord versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Concord may include: Upland, Santa-Rosa, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z