Compare-Cities.com
Compare Coachella to South San Francisco
This post compares Coachella, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Coachella (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,382 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $26,925 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $183,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 29% | 33% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 0% | 39% |
| With Kids | 43% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 34% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Coachella or South San Francisco?
A: Coachella has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 44382 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Coachella or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Coachella.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Coachella or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Coachella.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 34% for Coachella versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Coachella may include: La-Puente, Montclair, and South-San-Jose-Hills.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z