Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to South Pasadena
This post compares Claremont, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $928,500 |
| White | 65% | 54% |
| Black | 5% | 3% |
| Asian | 13% | 29% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 34% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or South Pasadena?
A: Claremont has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 35949 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z