Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Claremont, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $374,600 |
| White | 65% | 81% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 3% |
| With Kids | 29% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 34% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Claremont has a larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 35949 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z