Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to San Francisco
This post compares Claremont, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $927,400 |
| White | 65% | 47% |
| Black | 5% | 5% |
| Asian | 13% | 34% |
| With Kids | 29% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 34% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or San Francisco?
A: Claremont has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 35949 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z