Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to Reedley
This post compares Claremont, California to Reedley, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | Reedley (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 25,419 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $32,215 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $174,100 |
| White | 65% | 73% |
| Black | 5% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 3% |
| With Kids | 29% | 43% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 31 |
| Rentals | 34% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or Reedley?
A: Claremont has a larger population count than Reedley: 35949 compared with 25419 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in Reedley?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or Reedley?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Reedley does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 34% for Claremont versus 38% for Reedley.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z