Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to Pasadena
This post compares Claremont, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $689,700 |
| White | 65% | 53% |
| Black | 5% | 10% |
| Asian | 13% | 16% |
| With Kids | 29% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 37 |
| Rentals | 34% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or Pasadena?
A: Claremont has a much smaller population count than Pasadena: 35949 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z