Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to Palm Springs
This post compares Claremont, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $340,600 |
| White | 65% | 83% |
| Black | 5% | 4% |
| Asian | 13% | 4% |
| With Kids | 29% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 54 |
| Rentals | 34% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or Palm Springs?
A: Claremont has a similar population count than Palm Springs: 35949 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z