Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to Foster City
This post compares Claremont, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 65% | 43% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 47% |
| With Kids | 29% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 34% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or Foster City?
A: Claremont has a similar population count than Foster City: 35949 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z