Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to Burbank
This post compares Claremont, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Claremont (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,949 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $75,241 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $574,300 |
| White | 65% | 70% |
| Black | 5% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 11% |
| With Kids | 29% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 39 |
| Rentals | 34% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or Burbank?
A: Claremont has a much smaller population count than Burbank: 35949 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z