Compare-Cities.com
Compare Claremont to Bakersfield
This post compares Claremont, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Claremont (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 35,949 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $75,241 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $605,700 | $228,400 |
White | 65% | 68% |
Black | 5% | 7% |
Asian | 13% | 7% |
With Kids | 29% | 45% |
Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
Rentals | 34% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Claremont or Bakersfield?
A: Claremont has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 35949 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Claremont or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Claremont.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Claremont or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Claremont.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 34% for Claremont versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Claremont may include: Pleasant-Hill, Lake-Forest, and San-Dimas.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z