Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chino Hills to Union City
This post compares Chino Hills, California to Union City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chino Hills (city) | Union City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,025 | 74,354 |
| Income (median) | $66,607 | $55,732 |
| Home Value (median) | $567,200 | $620,200 |
| White | 46% | 21% |
| Black | 4% | 5% |
| Asian | 33% | 53% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 38 |
| Rentals | 23% | 34% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chino Hills or Union City?
A: Chino Hills has a similar population count than Union City: 78025 compared with 74354 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chino Hills or in Union City?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Chino Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chino Hills or Union City?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Chino Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Union City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Chino Hills versus 34% for Union City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chino Hills may include: San-Lorenzo, Cypress, and Newark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z