Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chino Hills to South Pasadena
This post compares Chino Hills, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chino Hills (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,025 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $66,607 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $567,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 46% | 54% |
| Black | 4% | 3% |
| Asian | 33% | 29% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 23% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chino Hills or South Pasadena?
A: Chino Hills has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 78025 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chino Hills or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Chino Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chino Hills or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Chino Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Chino Hills versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chino Hills may include: San-Lorenzo, Cypress, and Newark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z