Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chino Hills to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Chino Hills, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chino Hills (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,025 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $66,607 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $567,200 | $444,200 |
| White | 46% | 62% |
| Black | 4% | 9% |
| Asian | 33% | 13% |
| With Kids | 41% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 35 |
| Rentals | 23% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chino Hills or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Chino Hills has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 78025 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chino Hills or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Chino Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chino Hills or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Chino Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Chino Hills versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chino Hills may include: San-Lorenzo, Cypress, and Newark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z