Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chino Hills to Irvine
This post compares Chino Hills, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chino Hills (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,025 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $66,607 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $567,200 | $753,400 |
| White | 46% | 47% |
| Black | 4% | 1% |
| Asian | 33% | 41% |
| With Kids | 41% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 34 |
| Rentals | 23% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chino Hills or Irvine?
A: Chino Hills has a much smaller population count than Irvine: 78025 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chino Hills or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Chino Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chino Hills or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Chino Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Chino Hills versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chino Hills may include: San-Lorenzo, Cypress, and Newark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z