Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chino Hills to Foster City
This post compares Chino Hills, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chino Hills (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,025 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $66,607 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $567,200 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 46% | 43% |
| Black | 4% | 2% |
| Asian | 33% | 47% |
| With Kids | 41% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 40 |
| Rentals | 23% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chino Hills or Foster City?
A: Chino Hills has a larger population count than Foster City: 78025 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chino Hills or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Chino Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chino Hills or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Chino Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Chino Hills versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chino Hills may include: San-Lorenzo, Cypress, and Newark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z