Compare-Cities.com
Compare Chino Hills to Altadena
This post compares Chino Hills, California to Altadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Chino Hills (city) | Altadena (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78,025 | 45,236 |
| Income (median) | $66,607 | $64,923 |
| Home Value (median) | $567,200 | $649,800 |
| White | 46% | 53% |
| Black | 4% | 22% |
| Asian | 33% | 6% |
| With Kids | 41% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 43 |
| Rentals | 23% | 29% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Chino Hills or Altadena?
A: Chino Hills has a larger population count than Altadena: 78025 compared with 45236 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Chino Hills or in Altadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Chino Hills.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Chino Hills or Altadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Chino Hills.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Altadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 23% for Chino Hills versus 29% for Altadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Chino Hills may include: San-Lorenzo, Cypress, and Newark.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z